Trey Gowdy says Trump’s immigration order could use some clarity

Views: 1468
Photo by House Judiciary Committee

President Donald J. Trump’s recent executive order temporarily banning people from seven Muslim-majority countries could have been better written, according to U.S. Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.).

On Tuesday, Gowdy appeared on Fox News and shared his thoughts on the executive order, which bans people from Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Sudan, and Somalia from entering the U.S. for 90 days, and suspends the U.S. refugee resettlement program for 120 days.

Trump previously said the temporary travel ban is intended to allow American officials to implement more through screening procedures for immigrants – even though no one from the seven countries listed in the order has carried out a fatal terror attack on U.S. soil since before Sept. 11, 2001.

Many believe the order unfairly targets Muslims. However, Gowdy said the new administration could ease some of those concerns by further clarifying the categories of people barred from entering the U.S. from the seven countries listed.

“With different categories, like non-immigrant visa holders vs. U.S. citizens vs. non-U.S. citizens, there’s a different legal analysis,” Gowdy said.

Gowdy explained that a U.S. citizen is entitled to “the full panoply of constitutional rights and due process,” while a Yemeni citizen, for example, isn’t entitled to due process or Constitutional protections.

“If you have a visa and you have relied upon that visa to either rent an apartment or put your kids in school, then, you do have certain property interests that you would want protected. Therefore, you are entitled to due process,” Gowdy said. “So I think his executive order is pretty easily remedied.”

Gowdy added that it’s up to the administration’s legal advisers to provide Trump with evidentiary basis that can withstand a court’s scrutiny, more specifically the Supreme Court.

Last week, three judges with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s request to lift a Seattle-based judge’s restraining order, which blocked authorities from carrying out the temporary travel ban.

“You don’t want federal judges overlooking battle plans or decisions to strike certain targets or decisions related to war or national security. It is not a blank check that the chief executive and commander in chief has. But you certainly don’t have to clear everything with an Article Three unelected federal judge,” Gowdy said.

Previously, Trump threatened to appeal the ruling through the Supreme Court, but the White House filed a motion on Monday indicating that the administration is likely to take a different route.

Policy advisers believe the White House will either seek an emergency stay at the Supreme Court, contest the ruling before a larger panel of judges or request an emergency hearing and go to a trial court at the district level.

On Tuesday, Gowdy also broke his silence on former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, who resigned Monday after it was revealed that he misled Vice President Mike Pence and other White House officials about his conversations with the Russian ambassador to the United States.

“The president and vice president have the right to rely on advisors that provide them the unadulterated, complete, whole truth,” Gowdy said. “I have never met Gen. Flynn. People that I know that respect him and respect his service to the country. I would join that. But you have to tell the truth to your boss all the time.”

Former and current White House officials told several news outlets last week that Flynn had discussed U.S. sanctions with Russian Ambassador Sergey I. Kislyak in late December, weeks before President Donald J. Trump’s inauguration.

According to officials, Flynn left the impression that sanction relief would be possible under the Trump administration and urged Russia not to retaliate against future sanctions because an overreaction could complicate relations.

In his resignation letter, Flynn said he held several calls with foreign officials during the transition. “Unfortunately, because of the fast pace of events, I inadvertently briefed the vice president-elect and others with incomplete information regarding my phone calls with the Russian ambassador,” he wrote.

Republican leaders, including Sen. Lindsey Graham, have called for an investigation into Flynn. But GOP leadership refused to open a formal investigation on Tuesday, suggesting that ongoing probes of Russian influence in the 2016 presidential election have the authority to do so.

“I am all for the committees of jurisdiction, looking into it. I am also for looking into how classified information can make its way into the public domain,” Gowdy said.

“That is not a Republican issue or a Democrat issue. It’s a legal issue,” he added.

What Do You Think?

One thought on “Trey Gowdy says Trump’s immigration order could use some clarity”

  1. Sad that our Congressman is not stepping up to defend us against Russian interference! Full scale emergent investigation into all levels of interference and influence called for with so much at stake. Is the GOP a new wing of the Kremlin? Sad how much time and money wasted on prior investigations into far less egregious issues. American values are not being upheld here.

    Furthermore, there are three separate and equal branches of government. It allows for a more thorough and careful approach to governing. Yes, the executive branch and the legislative branch must work alongside the judicial.

    Moreover, this article ignores the many valuable, law-abiding immigrants who have rights to their family who might reside elsewhere. In fact many valuable, contributing physicians herald from the cited war torn countries of the immigration ban. Such nonsensical laws divide and do not protect us.

    We must stand up for American values. Do better Congressman to lead us in a better path. Investigate Russian interference, stand up for our judges and their true balancing role, and stand up for inclusion that will protect us more than sham divisions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *